Category: Technology


Man, I heart Technology.

July 17th, 2007 — 11:12am

After reading Brian’s & Boris’s tech musings this morning at alwaysBeta, two amazing tech revelations happened to me.

The first was that I learned a nifty hack already included in Better Gmail, a free extension from the folks over at Lifehacker. Like Brian, I’m a big user of Gmail and Google Reader, and speed is the key to my interactions with these products. So imagine my surprise when I found (after sticking my wireless mouse in my pocket and moving locations) the right-click conversation preview option, as below:

This is by far the most useful thing I’ve found in Better GMail: it’s bound to the “v” key (easy to remember, analogous to show original in GReader), it marks the item as read, and it’s smart enough to usually make itself the right size. One minor issue is that it doesn’t have an option to view images in preview, but that’s a pretty minor thing.

The second came about when I tried to take some screen caps for this post: I’ve long been tired of doing the PrintScreen->Paint/Photoshop/Gimp->Crop. SnagIt 8.2 is a great product, but it’s expensive: nearly $40 for a tool that I don’t/won’t use all that often. There are some okay open-source alternatives out there, but nothing that works quite as well as SnagIt. But surprisingly, TechSmith, the company that makes SnagIt, gives away an older version of the product (7.2.5, available from OldApps). Apparently, this is for readers of UK’s .Net Magazine, but putting in the US as an option works. Make sure you remember the name you use for the sign-up: the product key is bound to it.

I absolutely adore neat stuff.

Technorati Tags: , ,

2 comments » | Technology

iPhone

June 27th, 2007 — 3:05pm

I’m a sucker for good timing. I believe in it heavily. After all things happen for a reason, right? So when my mom told me I could expect to start paying for my own cell phone service in July, and the iPhone’s much ballyhooed arrival occuring at the same time, I wondered: Is fate telling me to get an iPhone?

To be honest, I haven’t really thought about it before this week, even though the marketing blitz has been on for months. Financially, the move would be bearable, if not ideal: The heavy initial cost for the unit could be absorbed by a sign-on bonus at work.

Like most folks though, I was more concerned with the recurring instead of the one-time. How much would the monthly data plan cost for all those goodies? And when the pricing (released yesterday) was in line with what I expect to pay with new service from Verizon, with loads of iPhone goodness thrown in essentially for free, I became sorely tempted to join those already in line at Apple Stores.

As some of you know, I’ve had a Palm Treo 650 for about 18 months now. While an acceptable PDA/phone (there’s nothing “smart” about these devices) It comfirms my thinking about technology devices: rare is the device that integrates features and does them all well. I initially was enthused to have a notepad, digital camera, camcorder, text messenger, calendar, contact list, e-mail, internet access, MP3 Player, AND phone all in one form factor. But the only things the treo 650 does really well are the text messenging and notepad. In other words, it’s the clunkiest, most expensive pen and paper in digital form.

I think we’ve forgotten: these things are supposed to be phones first and wunderdevices second. Maybe I’m a rare bird: I want my phone to be just a damn phone. Give me a cell phone that makes landline quality calls without dropping them, and I’ll give you lots of money a month. At the very least, give me a phone that is LOUD. Loud when it rings in my pocket, loud when I talk in the microphone, and loud when the other person talks. I always want to have to turn the volume down, not have to get pissed that it won’t turn up more.

Of course, I still want some of the things my treo has: that notepad sure comes in handy when I’m book browsing or window shopping. Sure, it’s nothing a pen and paper can’t handle, but as an example, having my bank account info stored in my phone means I don’t need to worry about running out of deposit slips when I have a check to deposit. And I’m not a heavy texter, but it has been a nice way to communicate when a phone call won’t work. And since I’ve got a wicked habit of texting like I’m on AIM, unlimited text messages, or a ridiculous number of them, is a must.

I am a tech adorer, but not an early adopter. I love the potential of gadgets, and purchase them when I can, but not frivolously. I don’t feel the need to do more than look up the occassional sports score when I’m out of computer reach. No YouTube videos, no New York Times Web reading: I’d much rather enjoy the view of the city from the train or read the actual newspaper. Yes, I understand that I could do those things on the iPhone better than I now can on my treo, but I don’t need them. Why create that need with purchasing an iPhone?

To be fair, a decade ago, the idea of carting around every album you own would have seemed unnecessary (not to mention absurd). The iPod built and delievered a commuting world where portable music is now ubiquitous. On the Boston Red Line there are just as many, if not more, people with iPods as there are without: white in-ear nubs the de facto rule, instead of an exception. Perhaps, just as the iPod, just as the original Palm Pilot, the iPhone is the first real integrator, the successful merge of the “full” internet (as the ads say), music, photos, and telephony into one device. Perhaps we are on the cusp of an always there, always on world where information is truly at one’s fingertips, a world where one can just as easily and quickly upload videos to YouTube, where the Gray Lady becomes an aggregator for instablog updates from around Manhattan and the world, provided by iPhoners. Perhaps we’re on the verge of a multimedia society where location-based information reaches a nexus Perhaps we’re just a million iPhones away from knowing exactly what’s on the next block over: a pizza parlor, heavy traffic, and a college buddy you haven’t seen in a few years. Perhaps.

Unfortunately, the biggest problem with the iPhone isn’t the fault of an Apple designer: it’s the fault of what passes for cell phone service in America. No company can lay claim to the “best” cell service: there’s a tremendous amount of dissatisfaction due to dropped calls or static. It’s a perpetual problem in the United States, apparent when things such as the 2003 North American Blackout occur: we focus on the ends, but not the pipe in between. For all impressive gizmos we can palm on our end, and all the whiz-bang gadgetry on their end, we kind of forget that the pipe in between is corroded and rotten. The first company to fix their pipe will have a huge competitive advantage, but if no company is working to fix the pipe, why should any of them bother? Particularly bad for the iPhone and Apple is their exclusive partner, the “new” AT&T, has little customer support and terrible reception. For me, at least, the wonders of the device will have to wait until I hear better feedback regarding AT&T. No gadget is worth any amount of additional frustration gained in using it. And since I need a phone now, and it will be at least two years before I look at new phone service, I can say that for Apple and the iPhone, this may be a classic case of poor timing.

1 comment » | Technology

Safari on Windows

June 12th, 2007 — 11:13am

My somewhat-informed understanding is that Apple is currently generating about $2 million per month from Safari’s Google integration. That’s $25 million per year. If Safari for Windows is even moderately successful, it’s easy to see how that might grow to $100 million per year or more.” – Daring Fireball via a co-worker.

Well, that makes sense. Also: There’s a fairly good chance that iPhone Web Sync support will be done through Safari via Bonjour.

Comment » | Technology

Gosh….

August 7th, 2006 — 4:13pm

Technology was spelled wrong this entire time. I just realized it. A loser am I. I guess that shows how many attentive people visit my site. What a contretemps.

Oh, and I’m 21 now. Hooray. Thanks to the many who sent birthday wishes!

Comment » | Life, Technology

Death Knell for AOL?

July 10th, 2006 — 12:18pm

No, this isn’t about the problems a now ex-AOL subscriber had in cancelling his account, or the ensuing mini-chaos in the media. But that incident may be helping AOL execs what most of us have long known: AOL dial-up service is a pretty ugly thing. The New York Times is reporting today (registration required, those bitches.) that AOL Chief Exec Jonathan Miller will introduce a plan to the Time Warner board to halt marketing for the AOL dial-up service and devote more – essentially all – resources to the free AOL.com web content. It’s a risky idea, of course, since subscribers pay in a very hefty portion to AOL (and parent company Time Warner) coffers.

But it may be a smart move in the long run. Fewer consumers are choosing or sticking with their dial-up accounts and moving to broadband access. There’s little for AOL in that market, since they can’t provide the bandwidth people need (having no access themselves to cable or DSL entry points, like phone or cable companies. Former AOL bigwig Steve Case kinda messed them up there.) Alternatively, AOL finds itself competing with Google and Yahoo! for ad revenues. Unfortunately for AOL, there’s no hybrid version. And AOL’s biggest problem in moving to a free-web/advertising revenue base is so many people have been turned off (no pun intended) to AOL in the past. There’s a tremendous amount of branding in the current web business model. People inherently support one company over another when they select a default search engine. Nobody really goes to Yahoo when they can’t find what they want with a Google search query: People simply edit their search terms and try again on Google.

Of course, AOL would suffer another problem: losing the built-in page views. This is how MSN and Yahoo! get so many hits: People don’t change their default home page when they purchase a new computer. Simply put, very few non-AOL subscribers have AOL.com as their homepage. If AOL loses subscribers, it also loses people who view their pages.

Bad move, short term. But the CEO realizes this. The only problem is: how good of of a move will it be in the long term?

Technorati Tags: , ,

Comment » | Technology

E-Reader goes on sale, about $600 too much

June 16th, 2006 — 10:47am

Engadget‘s got the details on the first e-reader to go on sale in Europe this month.

…[iRex]‘s threatened to come in first (and cheaper). Well, cheaper may no longer be the case, but it looks like the iRex is set to ship this month in Europe for a princely €649 ($820 US)…
As part of a business plan competition (wish I had the final plan, but it’s unavailable at the moment), a small group of us priced out what it would take to implement these in schools. We came up with a final price of approx. $150 (I believe) for the parts, warranty, etc. This included on the order of 20 actual pages you could flip, so that the look-and-feel was as close to a book as possible. Again, the market was not technophiles, but rather secondary and elementary school students, so durability was foremost. Even dealing with content licenses (provided by current publishing houses such as Houghton Mifflin and McGraw-Hill), this Digital Book would have still saved schools money. We like saving people money.

It’s important to note that this was a theoretical model, but it (in my opinion) was pretty thought out. We focused pretty extensively on having a lobbyist staff member capable of selling school districts on this, as well as the internal technology (battery life, digital paper, etc.) Even if we got the money needed (oh, it was only a few million dollars…) it’d take a good 3 years of hard-core development to come up with a prototype.

But hey, maybe if some people want to give us some capital, we’ll get to making a few.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

2 comments » | Technology

Power & Water for Everyone

February 20th, 2006 — 8:15pm

Good news from the land of Kamen (as in Dean Kamen): Two devices, one that creates power from any burnable source, and one that decontaminates water. The electric generator is powered by an easily-obtained local fuel: cow dung. Each machine continuously outputs a kilowatt of electricity. That may not sound like much, but it is enough to light 70 energy-efficient bulbs. As Kamen puts it, “If you judiciously use a kilowatt, each villager can have a nighttime.”

The Slingshot works by taking in contaminated water – even raw sewage — and separating out the clean water by vaporizing it. It then shoots the remaining sludge back out a plastic tube. Kamen thinks it could be paired with the power machine and run off the other machine’s waste heat.

Naturally, it’s good stuff like this that made me want to be an engineer. And for Kamen, it makes up for that pesky Segway.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Comment » | Technology

Extensions: Not just for lengthening your hair.

November 19th, 2005 — 12:27am

In the pursuit of tweaking firefox constantly until I find the most productive and least annoying way to tab, I think I may have gotten one step closer to my goal: Tab Mix Plus

It’s definitely not for the weak of heart. This manly extension is for folks who take their tabbed browsing seriously. The default settings are ultra crappy, but fear not: this puppy’s got all you want and more. (You’ll definitely want to uninstall quite a few other extensions if you switch to this. While a stable install, I got a few “settings-don’t-catch”) quirks while setting it up. The big happy? A setting that allows you to set your return tab to last viewed, so that when you view a popup-link, you don’t spend 15 seconds looking for the tab you launched from. This extension would probably take a bullet in your ass if you were in a combat situation.

Another dude you want on your team? Session Saver Nothing pleases me more in my internet addiction than the ability to close the browser, realize I pulled a stoopid, open it back up, and have it exactly the same way I left it. Not only does it fix human error, but on those rare often occassions when I’m sucking down the blue screen like it was Sharkleberry Fin (NSFW potentially due to ads, but I’m inclined to try the Trojan “Vibrating Ring” sometime. I digress.), Session Saver comes back A-Ok. It may be looking over my shoulder, but that’s only because it’s got my back. (Thanks, Colbert.)

I would try CoBrowse, but I have no friends. It looks ultra-sweet, and I just sold the guy who wrote it a few steaks. Seriously.

Comment » | Technology

Best use of RFID tags ever.

August 11th, 2005 — 3:13pm

When I read about the Delhi cow problem a few days ago, I wondered how they were going to handle repeat cow business. It turns out the government has its answer.

I’m impressed with the government’s handling of the problem. The Delhi government is providing $1.8 million to combat what is a serious traffic hazard (as well as a health risk).

Ah, if only the almost $300 Billion bill Bush signed into law yesterday gave me money for removing stuff from roads. Armadillos. Homeless people. Anything.

Link

Comment » | Technology

Back to top